Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2024 18:58:32 GMT
Obstruction Law Ruling
The US Supreme Court yesterday ruled federal prosecutors improperly relied on an obstruction law used in charging over 300 people involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the US Capitol.
At issue is the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, passed after the Enron financial scandal. The defendant in the obstruction challenge argued the statute applies only to the tampering of evidence. The high court agreed, requiring proof that a defendant's actions impaired the availability or integrity of physical evidence used in an official proceeding. The decision could affect roughly 150 people, who have pleaded guilty or received convictions under the statute.
The Supreme Court also overturned a 1984 decision that directed lower courts to defer to federal regulators when laws passed by Congress are unclear, and separately made it easier for cities to enforce laws against homeless encampments.
A ruling is expected Monday on former President Donald Trump's appeal for blanket immunity from criminal prosecution. Monday will mark the first time since 2020 (the second since 1996) in which the court's term has been extended into July.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2024 18:59:10 GMT
So all those unjustly arrested on Jan. 6th should SUE ever person on the Jan. 6th committee
|
|
|
Post by Justbec on Jun 29, 2024 19:28:05 GMT
I really hope they do
|
|
|
Post by mrright on Jul 1, 2024 2:54:28 GMT
So all those unjustly arrested on Jan. 6th should SUE ever person on the Jan. 6th committee and the taxpayers get to pay it. no thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2024 14:58:12 GMT
So all those unjustly arrested on Jan. 6th should SUE ever person on the Jan. 6th committee and the taxpayers get to pay it. no thanks No, if they sue the people on the committee as in Pelosi, etc., THEY would pay, not the tax payer.
|
|
|
Post by Justbec on Jul 1, 2024 16:39:49 GMT
So all those unjustly arrested on Jan. 6th should SUE ever person on the Jan. 6th committee and the taxpayers get to pay it. no thanks No they would sue the individuals (all of who got rich by being corrupt), not the government.
|
|
|
Post by mrright on Jul 1, 2024 19:07:27 GMT
and the taxpayers get to pay it. no thanks No, if they sue the people on the committee as in Pelosi, etc., THEY would pay, not the tax payer. well let me know when that happens
|
|
|
Post by sb on Jul 2, 2024 11:50:37 GMT
So all those unjustly arrested on Jan. 6th should SUE ever person on the Jan. 6th committee and the taxpayers get to pay it. no thanks I'd gladly contribute to that effort.
|
|
|
Post by lillygurl360 on Jul 7, 2024 0:24:36 GMT
Obstruction Law RulingThe US Supreme Court yesterday ruled federal prosecutors improperly relied on an obstruction law used in charging over 300 people involved in the Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the US Capitol. At issue is the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, passed after the Enron financial scandal. The defendant in the obstruction challenge argued the statute applies only to the tampering of evidence. The high court agreed, requiring proof that a defendant's actions impaired the availability or integrity of physical evidence used in an official proceeding. The decision could affect roughly 150 people, who have pleaded guilty or received convictions under the statute. The Supreme Court also overturned a 1984 decision that directed lower courts to defer to federal regulators when laws passed by Congress are unclear, and separately made it easier for cities to enforce laws against homeless encampments. A ruling is expected Monday on former President Donald Trump's appeal for blanket immunity from criminal prosecution. Monday will mark the first time since 2020 (the second since 1996) in which the court's term has been extended into July. Of course they did !
|
|