Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 5:28:32 GMT
I posted a typo- the statement was meant to be:
All the government information is not dishonest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 5:30:30 GMT
Why would I trust a drooling moron like Biden? Please stop repeating right wing crap. LOL... it's cute that you believe that that's "right wing crap" and can't comprehend that it's actually taken from video of the man actually acting like a drooling moron. Maybe you should stop believing left wing crap. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 5:32:05 GMT
I posted a typo- the statement was meant to be: All the government information is not dishonest. True. Lots of conservative and libertarian leaning stuff is actually true (not all of it, admittedly). MOST of the liberal/Democrat garbage however, is what is dishonest. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 7:14:45 GMT
There's a lot of left wing crap piling up in here. Biden is a doddering old man being held up with puppet strings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fuzzems on Aug 12, 2021 12:52:59 GMT
You can try to portray this as "right wing' but minorities are the among the least vaccinated group including black Americans. I guess they are right wing Trumpsters Don't even try that one fuzzems. Your arguments are coming from you reading and hearing right wing crap. Black opposition is coming from a history of government using blacks for experiments. Understand who you are talking to before you try that again. What it "comes from" doesnt' change the facts about their current vaccination status. |
|
|
|
Post by Fuzzems on Aug 12, 2021 12:53:38 GMT
I posted a typo- the statement was meant to be: All the government information is not dishonest. Never said it was. Except for 4 yrs you have been whining and crying that everything from the govt was. |
|
|
|
Post by Fuzzems on Aug 12, 2021 12:54:40 GMT
Nor are they able to determine how much immunity or for how long the vaccine lasts either. I think have natural immunity to the actual live virus is a far better than thing than manmade vaccine that isn't even targeting covid 19 but Sars 2 Actually it is targeting COVID and natural immunity isn't known. What we are seeing now are deaths from this variant by people who are not vaccinated. Now those are the facts and there is nothing either one of us can say that changes this fact. Vaccination immunity isn't KNOWN either. And, now they are finding that Pfizer is only about 40% effective against Delta. |
|
|
|
Post by Fuzzems on Aug 12, 2021 12:56:29 GMT
Try using credible sources and 19,000 is still bad. But you don't want to address their lies? Oh ok. You want me to "trust" them? Oh ok. Funny how in one breath you accuse the govt of systemic racism and experiments on blacks but now we are supposed to be unquestioning drones? Seriously im2? Don't you find your own position hypocritical? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 14:17:10 GMT
Try using credible sources and 19,000 is still bad. So, no comment regarding the over-inflated numbers, just criticizing the source. Typical left-wing crap response. I doubt the numbers were over inflated given the source of the story. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 14:23:03 GMT
Try using credible sources and 19,000 is still bad. But you don't want to address their lies? Oh ok. You want me to "trust" them? Oh ok. Funny how in one breath you accuse the govt of systemic racism and experiments on blacks but now we are supposed to be unquestioning drones? Seriously im2? Don't you find your own position hypocritical? No, because you bring up blacks to defend your position on a vaccine that has been publicly stated to be effective. Blacks were injected with syphillis and told nothing. Furthermore as a white person you do not have the history of government mistreatment blacks do and for you to bring up the subject is disingenuous given the fact you want to deny allforms of systemic racism. I am not going to address anything coming from the dailymail. Show me that story if it's printed by the Wall Street Journal. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 14:24:16 GMT
Actually it is targeting COVID and natural immunity isn't known. What we are seeing now are deaths from this variant by people who are not vaccinated. Now those are the facts and there is nothing either one of us can say that changes this fact. Vaccination immunity isn't KNOWN either. And, now they are finding that Pfizer is only about 40% effective against Delta. We do know that your are better off being vaccinated than not. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 14:26:59 GMT
I posted a typo- the statement was meant to be: All the government information is not dishonest. Never said it was. Except for 4 yrs you have been whining and crying that everything from the govt was. No, I have stated the FACT the information coming from trump was a lie. Furthermore trump shut down scientists and authorities if they did not say what he wanted to hear. There is a new president who doesn't do that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 14:28:10 GMT
Don't even try that one fuzzems. Your arguments are coming from you reading and hearing right wing crap. Black opposition is coming from a history of government using blacks for experiments. Understand who you are talking to before you try that again. What it "comes from" doesnt' change the facts about their current vaccination status. It does when it's not accurate. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 18:40:43 GMT
Try using credible sources and 19,000 is still bad. But you don't want to address their lies? Oh ok. You want me to "trust" them? Oh ok. Funny how in one breath you accuse the govt of systemic racism and experiments on blacks but now we are supposed to be unquestioning drones? Seriously im2? Don't you find your own position hypocritical?Looks like I'm not the only one who noticed that about im2. (bolded) Some light reading about OCS... The Psychology of Oppositional Conversational Style (OCS) Back by popular demand is the assay I wrote about the “oppositional conversational style” (OCS). This post really seems to strike a chord with people.Which surprised me at first, because when I identified OCS, I thought I was the only person who had ever noticed it.Turns out that many people have noticed it! From both sides of the OCS-dominated conversation.A person with oppositional conversational style is a person who, in conversation, disagrees with and corrects whatever you say. He or she may do this in a friendly way, or a belligerent way, but this person frames remarks in opposition to whatever you venture.I noticed this for the first time in a conversation with a guy a few months ago. We were talking about social media, and before long, I realized that whatever I’d say, he’d disagree with me. If I said, “X is important,” he’d say, “No, actually, Y is important.” For two hours. And I could tell that if I’d said, “Y is important,” he would’ve argued for X.A few questions about; Is OCS a strategy that particular people use consistently?
Along those lines, is OCS a way to try to assert dominance, by correction? That’s how it feels, and also…
Do people who use OCS recognize this style of engagement in themselves; do they see a pattern in their behavior that’s different from that of most other people?
Do they have any idea how tiresome it can be?psychcentral.com/blog/the-psychology-of-oppositional-conversational-style-ocs#1 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2021 15:16:27 GMT
Yes dio
You are incredibly TIRESOME
|
|
Aug 12, 2024 19:18:22 GMT
